(For more background, go back to my two previous posts.)
Kiel Schmidt and I just got out of the National Charrette Institute course on their NCI Charrette System. Bottom line: we’re psyched. We’re psyched to learn how much we already knew, and psyched to add to our skills the robust planning and management tools that NCI has to offer. Most of all, we’re psyched to put on a full blown charrette in Fresno, because we’re convinced that it’s a great tool for producing plans in a collaborative way, with good buy-in all around, fewer reworks, and lower costs . Here are a few highlights from the last few days. (Check out Kiel’s viewpoint at archop.org as well.)
I came in thinking that a charrette was a part of the design or planning process. Now, I’ve concluded that the charrette, or the charrette system, IS the design or planning process. The prep work, stakeholder outreach, public meetings and workshops, production of design alternatives, settling on a preferred plan, and producing renderings and other deliverables at the end — all of this is part of the charrette system. If you execute it well, you’ve completed 90% of the planning work, and — here’s the real selling point — all with intense public and stakeholder involvement, resulting in a very high chance of successful adoption and execution.
Right at the end today, someone asked Steve Coyle, “If I’m a consultant and I’m telling a client about this, in five words or less, how would I make the case for executing the NCI charrette system?” Steve answered, “You can’t afford not to.” Five words – that guy is good! After hearing from the presenters, and the seasoned planning and design professionals at my table who have been using the system, I’m convinced of its value. The NCI Charrette System has a track record of producing plans and designs that communities, jurisdictions and developers buy in on and — collaboratively — get behind.
One thing to think about: As I said in a previous post, our lead instructors, Bill Lennertz and Steve Coyle, definitely believe in the power of public, transparent collaboration among all stakeholders to achieve better plans and designs, better buy-in, and decrease costly reworks. However, the way they talk about public participation sometimes paints the public or the various stakeholders less as indispensable players in the process and more as obstacles to be overcome. This may stem from the highly contentious nature of planning – and Steve and Bill have been thrust in the middle of some very contentious situations.
Another thing to think about: The NCI Charrette system emphasizes preparation for the charrette, and they give consultants a wide range of tools and tips for getting to know the communities where they work. Bill characterized it as a process of coming to see the “obstructionist neighbor” as a real person with a point of view – and he called on us to spend the time to be able to see that of all the stakeholders.