I sort of made it on the Oprah show; well actually that is not true. What is true is that her website mentioned my new living situation called “CoHousing”. It is being referred to as a sort of “tribal lifestyle”. As an Anthropologist, I find this oddly fascinating. The story, by Jeanie Lerche Davis is from her byline called Single and Loving It. In an article entitled “New-Style Communities”, Lerche states that,
“Cohousing” is one answer. It’s a form of group housing much like a ’60s commune, but yuppie-style. These are condo-style developments built around a “common area” with kitchen, dining, laundry, exercise, and children’s playroom facilities. Cohousing communities are typically designed to resemble old-fashioned neighborhoods. Members get together often to share meals, socialize, and handle the ordinary stuff of daily living although they live in individual units. “Intentional community” is an inclusive term for ecovillages, cohousing, residential land trusts, communes, student co-ops, farms, urban housing cooperatives, and other projects. Intentional communities can be found all over the U.S. and Europe, their growth spurred by the Internet. Typically, community members jointly own land that has multiple dwellings. Frequently, members share a common bond—a religious, political, or social philosophy that brings them together…….
The above is all fairly true in my case but the comparison to a “tribe” is not very helpful. You can call me a “hippie” or a “green commie” as my students do but to claim that we live at a very simplistic level sociopolitical complexity is way off base. I’m not taking offense at being compared to being a member of a“band-level society”. Rather, I feel the need to point out that complex societies allow for small “pockets of temporary simplicity” and that these pockets are temporary in nature. Such pockets stand in opposition and in fact “maintain” the very things that they are resisting. Lerche continues,
“Urban tribes form in a vacuum,” Watters (author of the book Urban Tribes) tells WebMD. “Our generation has not joined the traditional social organizations our parents did, the churches and civic groups. We don’t stay in our jobs as long. That leads to a social vacuum, and humans don’t do well in a social vacuum. Something will fill it. That’s where Thanksgiving dinners started out as stopgap measure, then 10 years later, we realize these friends have become our family.” Read on at Single and Loving It.
![]()
You can read the rest of the article but if you are hoping to find any systematic anthropology there, don’t hold your breath. Now that I have lived in the Fresno CoHousing community for a couple of months, I can echo Kermit’s point that “it ain’t always easy being green”. The assumption that I’m a churchless single and drifting from job to job smarts. I’m active in my church, I’ve had the same job for the past six years (with no plan on departing) and I’ve been married for over ten years (and have a couple kids to boot). I guess my beef is mostly with Watters who, in an effort to make a point, has been a bit too reductive for my taste. This is one angry villager who is standing up for his subaltern status!

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 16, 2009 at 4:53 pm
anthroguy
Ah, the first and long-awaited “angry villager” post. Give us more!
April 11, 2009 at 7:22 pm
ForsytheV
I was unaware that such housing occurred in present day. I find it very intriguing and perhaps more people should look into the concept. I understand it is not for everyone, but that’s the beauty of our country-conformity is not a necessity! The way cohousing fosters a sense of community seems to be the real goal here. People don’t like change and I think that may be why this concept has been so misconstrued. These assumptions that you mentioned above are unfortunately thought from naive or narrow minded people.
November 4, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Ashley Tom
I think that more people should look into cohousing. Before when I thought of cohousing the only thing that came to mind was living in dorms, which does not sound so appealing. Although, I think that if cohousing was more popular people would branch out of they’re own little worlds. Today’s society has closed itself off from their neighbors. You no longer see block parties or people catching up over cups of coffee, but they are now communicating only through text messages and emails. Where is the connection? Children are now lacking in communication skills because all they are doing now is texting or messaging each other on Facebook. Yes, I agree messaging comes in handy, but it should not be the only way that you communicate with someone.
April 13, 2009 at 9:40 am
theanthrogeek
Here Here! Thanks for responding. Things are certainly never as simple as they seem at a distance. Get a little closer and most onions have many layers. The funny thing about “life in a village” is that few have ever planned for it before cohousing. Most who lived in villages for the majority of our history did not have a choice in the matter. In fact, most who can leave the village for “the city” or “rural privacy”, do. So why would anyone choose to live in community with others if there is no ideological force (like a religion) drawing them together?
I’m still working on an answer to that one.
May 12, 2009 at 9:05 pm
kiat
I just do not see how co-housing can be considered easy althought is would be the perfect living arrangement in today’s economic downturn. The “tribal lifestyle” of the past worked for our ancestors because they have certain qualities and they live in a different society. A lot of the times what hold our ancestors together in their close knit community is because they considered every member their family. Everyone in the community work together as a whole for the community. I dont see how we can take what we are today–ie independent, materialistic, and selfish..and put everything aside to live a tribal lifestyle. Just imagine how hard it can be to get along with every member of your family at thanksgiving. Even if i think co-housing is not going to be easy i think it is possible as long as the people co-housing have something in common be it religious or common interests.
December 10, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Jose V
If Oprah is for co-housing she should let me move in to her mansion, just kidding. When I think of co-housing it reminds me of when I lived aboard the Nimitz aircraft carrier with about five thousand military personal. It was a living experience that was unforgettable, because we would have fights, domestic deputes, and other dramas that were pretty funny. But other than that I think that we all got along very well not only because we had to live together but also work together. And getting to know one another on a personal level was very interesting because you would meet people form all walks of life. I have to say that co-housing keeps life very interesting, but in a unique sort of way. I think that this is a great way to broaden your horizons and learn how to cope and socialize with different people.
July 22, 2010 at 1:32 pm
JessicaG.
I believe that cohousing is great because one is more aware of their surroundings. You know all of the people in your community. Therefore, if someone is having problems with their care, someone will most likely volunteer to give them a ride to work. Since they live in the same location, they are able to share meals together when holidays come around, especially since they know each other well. They trust their neighborhood to watch their kids when the parents go on dates with one another. I believe that together, as a community, they strive to improve their community for their children. Cohousing is greatly beneficial to society because nowadays, the world has become very dangerous. It is a good idea to have other parent’s lookout for ones kids when you are at work. It is vital for children and teens to involve their lives in their community because as they grow up, they will be involved in someone’s life, thus making a difference. It would be interesting to have a variety of cultures work together because they all bring something different to the table that we all can learn from. If an emergency arises, you may have someone who can help you in any way that they can.
July 26, 2010 at 9:51 pm
jessicagallegos925
I have lived in co-housing environment all my life. I believe that co-housing is very beneficial for society because they are well organized communities that work together. Co-housing provides us with a different atmosphere because you are more likely to know all your neighbors like in older generations. For example, they may share meals together during holidays. They are most likely to have one of their neighbors take care of their kids because they are like family. When parents are at work, other parents are likely to take care of the neighbors kids. It is important to keep the children safe and involve in activities such as music, fixing bikes, cooking, and gardening with other members of the community. Now day’s teens and kids are sitting around watching TV or playing video games which is not healthy for them. It time to have good social communication. Throughout my experience, I have seen a community working together which have help me to be the person that I am today. I have stay involved in my community since I was seven years old. I have been involved in school leadership, community affairs and church. Therefore, I strongly agree that people should really consider co-housing.