On Feb. 5, the Anthrogeek, six anthro students and I were down at this month’s ArcHop exhibit, a full-scale model of a small efficiency unit that, if built in a proposed development here, could be the first stop for people leaving homelessness in Fresno. We were there, with architect/collaborators Kiel Famellos-Schmidt, Shaunt Yemenjian and Mike Pinheiro, for opening night, as members of the public came through to view the model and give us their thoughts on high-density, affordable downtown living. The event was a success, crowded and bustling, with plenty of people willing to blab to our students who were on hand with notebooks, pens and cameras rolling. This past Feb. 14-15, we started Phase II of the project, with two participatory design workshops for homeless people who might eventually end up in these units. On Saturday, anthro student Elfego Franco, Kiel and I went down to Roeding Park where the folks at Food Not Bombs put on lunch for homeless people on the southwest end of Fresno every Saturday. Al Williams, a local homeless advocate and former homeless person himself agreed to recruit some folks for a workshop the next day at 2pm. We then met Mike and went to the downtown homeless encampment known as “Little Tijuana” to recruit for the 10am workshop. This means we went up to about 15 homeless people, sight unseen, to explain the project and see if anyone was interested. Despite some wary looks, most were, and we agreed to see them the next day.
We went back to Little Tijuana on Sunday, picked up nine participants and headed over to Broadway Studios where the model is located. During the three hour workshop, which we did inside the model itself, we experienced an amazing degree of openness and engagement from everyone present, including the four primary Spanish speakers, thanks to Elfego’s translating capabilities. At 2pm, we had similarly fine results with six more participants. As I’ve said before, my job carries the privilege of being allowed a peek at other peoples’ lives. In the workshops, we drew, talked, and acted out skits aimed at getting at the way the participants thought about home and housing, and how they would like their first home out of homelessness to be. Everyone agreed that any homeless person would be tickled to have a roof over their head, an observation made all the more poignant by the three days of heavy rain we had preceeding the event. But the participants also shared with us some significant design insights that Kiel, Shaunt and Mike will incorporate into future designs.
After the second workshop, I went home and changed into some nice clothes and made the geographically short but socially looooooooong ride to north Fresno, to the church where my future mother-in-law, a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, was speaking about how to support each other in times of grief. The transition from talking to people who have next to nothing to sitting among fifty fresh-faced people in Sunday best made my head spin. We live in a strange society.
Though my Sunday night at church was the product of a personal connection, the radical shift I made across the social terrain of Fresno from 10am to 7pm could have easily been the result of my professional life. I traverse that terrain every week and sometimes every day. My current projects are putting me, the Anthrogeek, and our students in contact with Fresno State undergrads, homeless people, affluent magazine readers, and car salesmen. Bored with life in Fresno? Come join us.

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 27, 2009 at 9:59 am
Tami Fr
First, kudos to you and your team of grad students for conducting the experiment with the homeless. I would be very uncomfortable going down to “Little Tijuana.” I can hardly wait to see the “ArcHop” exhibit. I am impressed with the thought that it may be possible for homeless people to have an efficient place to live – especially with a roof and a door not to mention the other amenities that they do not have now. I appreciate your comment about the “…socially looooooooong ride to north Fresno…” I myself live in north Fresno and am somewhat intimidated by other areas in Fresno (I am not a native and have lived here only three years). I think it would be good for all students to be involved in an experiment such as the one you did. I think it might help me, and others like me, to understand and appreciate the different dimensions and cultures in Fresno. Tami F.
November 4, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Ashley Tom
I understand how you would feel uncomfortable going down to that area of town Tami. I also give applause to those that step out of their own comfort zones to make a difference in other people lives that are not so fortunate. I have felt that nervousness when I helped with a habitat for humanities project. It is very weird to think that just a few miles south is a whole different world, a world that I myself stay away from because of fear. I grew up in a very small town in the mountains and had to transfer to a Fresno school in the middle of the year for a few months. I do not know where to even begin on how much of a culture shock it was for me. I went from knowing that there were things such as gangs, to going to school with gang members, and coming from a school that did not have a single African American student, to now being the minority in a predominantly African American school. I was terrified the first few weeks. Now that I look back to my experience that I had it is confusing, because I still get that nervous feeling when I am not in my little suburbia where everyone smiles an waves at each other. It has made me appreciate the sheltered life that I have, and has given me the desire to help others that are not so fortunate. I want to share the feeling of security when going to bed, and waking up knowing that there is running water to brush my teeth with.
December 5, 2009 at 3:36 pm
ChristopherP
Just as Tami and Ashley said, it is truly amazing to see you guys taking your anthropological backgrounds and applying your time, knowledge, and effort in hopes to help the less privileged. It”s always a marvelous thing to see people helping others, especially voluntarily. The city of Fresno does provide quite an array of social and cultural diversities. I can also relate to you ladies (Tami and Ashley) when you describe the drastic change in atmosphere/environment. At least once a month, I volunteer at the Paverello House downtown to help feed the homeless. Its quite an experience and sight to see the homeless tent encampments. Work as this provides an insight for people to step outside their usual norms, allowing us an opportunity to grow on many levels. At first, it was surely a social shock to see how these people are living. And with the way our economy has been, it seems the impact and true extent of poverty is becoming more and more evident. Unfortunately, as unemployment rates increase, governmental services are taking a decrease. In “Little Tijuana,” as many as a few hundred live here. These people need our help and in some way, the homeless crisis has an impact on all Fresno residents. Providing these efficient housing units and seeking feedback from those who would benefit from it is a brilliant design.
Keep up the impressive work!
March 1, 2009 at 7:40 pm
56:AnthroNews:TheAnthroGuys Blog « Culture Inscribed
[...] [That's not the end! To read the rest, and other blogs, go to: http://theanthroguys.wordpress.com/2009/02/16/bored-in-fresno-become-an-anthropologist/ [...]
March 6, 2009 at 11:14 am
kiat
It is always great to know that people are doing something to help those less fortunate. Sometimes we get so caught up in our daily lives that we do not realize how well off we have it. I remember one incident when a teacher ask her students how many T. V. do each have in their household and everyone responded that they have at least one T.V. and half of the other students have more than one throughout the house. When I take this into consideration even people with low ecomomic status are better off than the homeless person.
I think the project is a great idea because it would provide shelter in Fresno’s extreme weather. I am looking foreward to seeing how this project turn out like.
April 22, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Merrily Mccarthy
since I can noFieldwork in Morocco – Chapter two
Packaged Goods
The author is traveling to Sefrou, a town in Morocco. The country is a kingship with
Many businesses offering modern services. It has a jewish quarter or community. Close by is a never area called ville nouelle. The administration is under the French Protectorate of 1912, leading to Moroccan independence in 1956, with progressive models of colonial administration. New little cities called villes Nouvelles were built beside the older settlement.
So the attraction is European cities, intermixed with quaint picturesque toddling communities of ancient times, or so it seems. That is how it seems but the author tells a different story. The culotural tone of Sefrou is set by the French population with a mix of fantasy, money and adaptation to European fashionable attitudes.
Rabinow desired to learn Arabic so he employed a teacher named Ibrahim, who was really one of the new bourgeois store oerators. They sell bourgeois good and do not engage in the conspicuous consumption of the Europeans. They save money and reinvest it in business and property. Ibrahim had b een an official government interpretor. He knew French well and used the language as a means to make money. He acted as linguistic mediator between the Moroccan and the French and his Arabic community
Without getting his identity confused by the colornial presence. Ibrahim was not a culturally cynical person, but rather a man of his own culture. He had sons and taught them French and Arabic, he goes to his mosque and the parent/teacher association. He archieved a blind of tradition and modernity in his life. He had tried to work with Richard but this fizzled and they are merely cordial at this time. It was because of Richard he was introduced to Ibrahim. They drank mint tea and spoke about working together. He said he had not taught Moroccan before but would be happy to try because he was glad an American wanted to learn his language, and understand his society.
Rabinow was happy about their agreed arrangement and noted Ibrahim stood by the quote, “in business your words and reputation are your most valuable asset.”
Rabinow visited his house and saw he lived with his wife and his mother in a simple elegant fashion whereby the size of a mans pillows determines his wealth. The house was like Ibrahim, functional, restrained and moderately prosperous.
Rabinow learned how not to learn a language – not to learn a language – not by rote memorization nor by a reduplicate of how one learns his French. Not by volcabulary lists! Not by phrases and lists about obtuse objects one had no where to use. So he learned to greet, and little else.
Ibrahim had been translating from his old French grammar book into Arabic. Rabinow was getting regurigitated linguistics. Which made him have anxiety attacks. Rabinow blamed himself thinkging it was his fault, so he got angry, and realized the structure of the situation had to be changed.
Ibrahim had turned his position into a profession and had becomRabinow out of his culture while he played at bringing him closer. He did not want Rabinow to get close. Arabic people protect with fierceness 3 things: their language, their religion, and their women. These are highly prized and charged symbols of integrity and identity.
Yet armies of prostitutes are not protected domains, yet they could not intermarry. Veiled Islam remained out of French control. And as well the not sharing the Arabic language. That was basically a defence to keep the French out! The first wave of Moroccan immigrants learned but the 2nd did not learn Arabic. But the Moroccans had leaned French and this points out that language can be used as a tool of war.
They came to heads realizing there goals were at odds. Rabinow desired more than surfaces and facets, he wanted into the society. He altered his situation. Two of his friends arrived and they all wanted to go to Marrakech. Ibrahim invited himself along. He had lied and did not bring any money. He was testing to see what he could get. Rabinow refused, realizing Ibrahim had been trying to maximize his resources. Rabinow was angry because he had typidfied and been ethnocentric in his assumptions of Ibrahim. He though of him as a friend because of a phony personal relationship, Ibrahim thought of Rabinow as a resource. Rabinow was looking for his anthropological goal of Otherness.
He had to switch up his social and cultural categories. He had wrong approaches to his conversations thinkg they were something other than what they were. That other people share a similar life – world. This allows everyone to feel they are all on the same page. People can’t stand scrutiny, they require compatible understanding and consistant definition and common sense. Rabinow found out his assumptions about Ibrahim were wrong and their cultures and ideas about life- ways miles apart.
July 27, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Critique: Tower District Streetscape Design Charrette « TheAnthroGuys
[...] Bored in Fresno? Become an Anthropologist [...]
July 27, 2009 at 8:27 pm
Critique: Tower District Streetscape Design Charrette
[...] District Streetscape Plan Q & A with Diego Velasco Tower District Streetscape charrette video Bored in Fresno? Become an Anthropologist ArcHop Construction [...]