This afternoon TheAnthroGuys are giving a presentation about our core competency: Analytic Induction. Our objective is to introduce entrepreneurship students to Analytic Induction in search of opportunities to “add value“.
We will be in a lecture hall of entrepreneurship students at Fresno State. Incidentally, the name of the lecture hall is, “Pete P Peters”. As I often tell students of ethnography, reality is usually far more interesting than fiction once you start actually noticing it.
Elsewhere, we have observed that our world is utterly overshadowed by ignorance, yet few people notice this. Ethnographers and entrepreneurs share a reliance on inductive skills to accomplish their goals. Once this is understood, we can learn a great deal from each other.
Here is our Presentation Slides
It is importnat to note that the similarities between anthropologists and entrepreneurs are numerous. The table below illustrates this point:
|Trained to think holistically||Intuitively holistic||visionary, iconoclastic|
|Take an evolutionary approach||Forward-looking||know future demands|
|Seek the insider perspective||Intuitively know consumers wants||know when something will have value to others|
|Trained to be inductive||Intuitively inductive||keen observers, see openings|
Other helpful guides include:
Read this article http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/03/anthropology-inc/309218/?single_page=true from The Atlantic entitle, “Anthropology Inc.”.
Or, Watch the clip that was attached to the above article http://bcove.me/k6szvgkh from The Atlantic.
-Check out: “A Crash Course on Creativity” (Tina Seelig, Executive Director, Stanford Technology Ventures Program)
-View the following 3 min video entitled: Field Observation with Fresh Eyes by Tom Kelley | IDEO
-View the following 4 min video entitled: Thinking Like a Traveler by Tom Kelley | IDEO
-Watch: Parc’s use of these techniques.
-Define: The notion of “workarounds”
We will return to their class to continue this discussion. Our hope is that some – if not all – of these students will see the value of this skill set and in so doing, realize that “thinking out of the box” can be learned.
We have included how the assignments are evaluated but the the main point is that this is NOT rocket science. Rather , it’s social science! Applied systematically, humans’ natural observational skills can notice things that are typically ignored. With some analysis, suggestions can be made to improve lives, products, profit margins, whatever.
If you have further questions about the assignment or the course, feel free to contact us at: email@example.com
Note; the following table is used to evaluate these assignments.
|4 Accomplished (18-20*)||Solid evidence of a period of observation provided. Sufficient details were included to clearly illustrate the problem under investigation.||Clear, concise description of the observed problem. The report illustrates a keen understanding of the problem.||New, clever suggestion for a product or service that directly solves the problem. The solution is novel for the context and sounds practical in terms of resources.|
|3Competent(16-17)||Some evidence of a period of observation provided. The problem under investigation is evident.||Concise description of the observed problem. The report illustrates an understanding of the problem.||Clever suggestion for a product or service that solves the problem. The solution is novel for the context but impractical.|
|2Satisfactory(14-15)||Some evidence of an recent observation provided. The problem under investigation is not evident.||Some evidence of an understanding of the observed problem is provided.||The product or service suggestions is not new or does not solve the problem defined or is highly impractical.|
|1not Satisfactory(12-13)||Little to no evidence of a recent observation done for this project.||Little evidence of analysis or of a problem is provided.||Little evidence of a novel or practical suggestion.|
If you would like examples of well written assignments, send an request to Jmullooly@csufresno.edu